Bibliography

Legislation

  • Accident Compensation Act 2001

  • Animal Products Act 1999, 133A, 165B, 165C (Food Safety Law Reform Act 2018).

  • Biosecurity (Infringement Offences) Regulations 2010, schedule 1, s 154N(20), (Biosecurity (Infringement Offences) Amendment Regulations 2018).

  • Biosecurity Act 1993, ss 142F and 142G (Biosecurity Law Reform Act 2012).

  • Criminal Procedure (Transfer of Information) Regulations 2013.

  • Customs and Excise Act 2018, ss 295, 296, 297, 298, 299. Note that similar provisions were present at ss 274A-274D under the Customs and Excise Act 1996.

  • Customs and Excise Regulations 1996,

  • Family Court Rules 2002

  • Fisheries (Electronic Monitoring on Vessels) Regulations 2017

  • Food Act 2014, ss 239, 374, 375

  • Harmful Digital Communications Rules 2016,

  • Holidays Act 2003

  • Immigration (Visa, Entry Permission, and Related Matters) Regulations 2010, reg 8 (Immigration (Visa, Entry Permission, and Related Matters) Amendment Regulations 2010).

  • Immigration Act 2009, ss 28, 29, 29A (Immigration (International Visitor Conservation and Tourism Levy) Amendment Act 2019).

  • Intelligence and Security Act 2017,

  • Interpretation Act 1999

  • Legal Service Act 2011, s 16A.

  • Legislation Act 2019

  • Official Information Act 1982

  • Organic Products Bill (2020, 221-1), cl 121, 122.

  • Referenda (Postal Voting) Act 2000,

  • Road User Charges Regulations 2012,

  • Summary Proceedings Act 1957, ss 86DA, 86DB, 86DC (Courts Matters Act 2018).

  • Supreme Court Act 2003

  • Supreme Court Rules 2004,

  • Victims’ Orders Against Violent Offenders Rules 2014,

  • Wine Act 2003, ss 101A, 118A, 118B (Food Safety Law Reform Act 2018).

Cases

  • Attorney-General v Spencer [2015] NZCA 143

  • Chamberlain v Minister of Health [2018] NZCA 8; [2018] 2 NZLR 771

  • Commerce Commission v Fonterra Co-Operative Group Ltd [2007] NZSC 36, [2007] 3 NZLR 767

  • Ye v Minister of Immigration [2009] NZSC 76, [2010] 1 NZLR 104

  • New Zealand Air Line Pilots’ Assoc Industrial Union of Workers Inc v Director of Civil Aviation [2017] NZCA 27, [2017] 3 NZLR 1

  • Donselaar v Donselaar [1982] NZCA 13; [1982] 1 NZLR 97 (CA)

Standard Form Agreements

  • Auckland District Law Society Agreement for Sale and Purchase (10th ed, 2019)

Technical Reports, Guides, Handbooks, and Exploratory Materials

  • Better for Business Better rules – better outcomes: <https://www.betterforbusiness.govt.nz/better-rules-better-outcomes/>

  • Better Rules For Government Discovery Report (March, 2018) available from <https://www.digital.govt.nz/dmsdocument/95-better-rules-for-government-discovery-report/html>.

  • James Mohun, Alex Roberts Cracking the code: Rulemaking for humans and machines (OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 42, Paris: OECD Publishing 2020)

  • Manfred Kohler How to Regulate (The Regulatory Institute, Version 1.1, September 2014): <https://www.howtoregulate.org/the-handbook/>

  • OECD-OPSI “Embracing Innovation in Government: Global Trends” (2019): <https://trends2019.oecd-opsi.org/>

  • Service Innovation Lab “Better Rules and Legislation as Code”: <https://serviceinnovationlab.github.io/projects/legislation-as-code/>

  • Valerie Frissen, Marlies van Eck, Thijs Drouen Research report on Supervising governmental use of algorithms (Hooghiemstra and Partners, 2 January 2020)

Government Publications

  • (24 September 2019) Rates Rebate (Statutory Declarations Amendment Bill – First Reading: <https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/hansard-debates/rhr/combined/HansDeb_20190924_20190924_24>.

  • Department of Internal Affairs “Service Design Principles” (Digital Identity Programme): <https://www.digital.govt.nz/standards-and-guidance/design-and-ux/service-design/service-design-principles/>

  • Parliamentary Counsel Office “Turning Policy Into Law: A step-by-step guide for instructors”: <http://policy-to-law.pco.govt.nz/>; see also “Whole Step-by-Step Guide (Text Only)”: <http://policy-to-law.pco.govt.nz/view-whole-guide/>

  • Performance Improvement Framework “Review of the Parliamentary Counsel Office (PCO)” (November 2014): <https://www.publicservice.govt.nz/assets/Legacy/resources/pif-review-pco-nov14.PDF>

  • Pia Andrews “Gov as a Platform: A Value Proposition Discussion Paper” (8 September 2017): <https://www.digital.govt.nz/blog/gov-as-a-platform-a-value-proposition-discussion-paper/>

  • Report 35 of the New Zealand Law Commission “Legislation Manual: Structure and Style” (May 1996) E 31Y

  • See Accident Compensation Better Rules Discovery Team “Exploring Machine Consumable Accident Compensation Legislation” (July 2019): <https://serviceinnovationlab.github.io/assets/Exploring_Machine_Consumable_Code_With_ACC.pdf>

  • See Department of Internal Affairs, Digital Government “Service design – overview”: <https://www.digital.govt.nz/standards-and-guidance/design-and-ux/service-design/service-design-overview/>

  • See Nadia Webster, Department of Internal Affairs “Global Coverage of our legislation as code work” (29 August 2018): <https://www.digital.govt.nz/blog/global-coverage-of-our-legislation-as-code-work/>

  • Welsh Office of the Legislative Counsel “Guidance on Instructing: Common Legislative Solutions” (2019)

  • Parliamentary Counsel Office “Principles of Clear Drafting”. See “Other Drafting Tools”: <http://www.pco.govt.nz/clear-drafting#otherdraftingtools>.

  • Legislative Design Advisory Committee “Legislation Guidelines: 2018 edition”: <http://www.ldac.org.nz/guidelines/legislation-guidelines-2018-edition/>

  • Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet “Cabinet Manual” (2017): <https://dpmc.govt.nz/our-business-units/cabinet-office/supporting-work-cabinet/cabinet-manual>

  • “How laws are made”, NZ Parliament: <https://www.parliament.nz/en/visit-and-learn/how-parliament-works/how-laws-are-made/>

  • First reading, Films, Videos, and Publications Classification (Urgent Interim Classification of Publications and Prevention of Online Harm) Amendment Bill (10 February 2021) Volume 749 NZPD https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/hansard-debates/rhr/combined/HansD_20210210_20210210

Graphic novels

  • Wagner, J, McCrea, J, MacNeil, C “Judge Dredd, Mechanismo: Machine Law” (2020)

Texts and Journal articles

  • Agassi J, Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations: An Attempt at a Critical Rationalist Appraisal (Springer International Publishing 2018) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-00117-9>

  • Ahmed U, ‘The Importance of Cross-Border Regulatory Cooperation in an Era of Digital Trade’ (2019) 18 World Trade Review S99

  • Ahu T, ‘Te Reo Maori as a Language of New Zealand Law: The Attainment of Civic Status’ <http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/handle/10063/2811>

  • Aljanati LP, ‘Promoting Multilingual Consistency for the Quality of EU Law’ (2017) 30 International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 67

  • Allen LE, ‘Symbolic Logic: A Razor-Edged Tool for Drafting and Interpreting Legal Documents’ (1957) 66 The Yale Law Journal 833

  • Anagnostopoulos I, ‘Fintech and Regtech: Impact on Regulators and Banks’ (2018) 100 Journal of Economics and Business 7

  • Anand K, Mitra S and Chittimalli P, ‘Semantic Search and Query Over SBVR-Based Business Rules Using SMT Based Approach and Information Retrieval Method’:, Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering (SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications 2019) <http://www.scitepress.org/DigitalLibrary/Link.aspx?doi=10.5220/0007710700470058>

  • Antonini A and others, ‘The Construction of Models and Roles in Normative Systems’ in Pompeu Casanovas and others (eds), AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems, vol 8929 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-662-45960-7_9>

  • Araszkiewicz M and others, ‘Framing a Knowledge Base for a Legal Expert System Dealing with Indeterminate Concepts’ (2015) 2015 The Scientific World Journal 1

  • Arner DW, ‘150 Years of Fintech’: [2016] JASSA The Finsia Journal of Applied Finance 8

  • Arner DW and others, ‘FinTech and RegTech: Enabling Innovation While Preserving Financial Stability’ (2017) 18 Georgetown Journal of International Affairs 47

  • Arnold-Moore T, ‘Automatic Generation of Amendment Legislation’, Proceedings of the sixth international conference on Artificial intelligence and law - ICAIL ’97 (ACM Press 1997) <http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=261618.261631>

  • Ashley, K D “Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics: New tools for Law Practice in the Digital Age” (2017, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom) at pp 38-42

  • Ashley KD and McLaren BM, ‘An AI Investigation of Citation’s Epistemological Role’, Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law - ICAIL ’01 (ACM Press 2001) <http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=383535.383539>

  • Assar S, Boughzala I and Boydens I (eds), Practical Studies in E-Government (Springer New York 2011) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4419-7533-1>

  • Athan T and others, ‘OASIS LegalRuleML’, Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law - ICAIL ’13 (ACM Press 2013) <http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2514601.2514603>

  • Bańkowski Z and Schafer B, ‘Double-Click Justice: Legalism in the Computer Age’ (2007) 1 Legisprudence 31

  • Barnes J, ‘When “plain Language” Legislation Is Ambiguous : Sources of Doubt and Lessons for the Plain Language Movement.’ [2010] Melbourne University Law Review <https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/agispt.20123489>

  • Bartolini R and others, ‘Automatic Classification and Analysis of Provisions in Italian Legal Texts: A Case Study’ in Robert Meersman, Zahir Tari and Angelo Corsaro (eds), On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2004: OTM 2004 Workshops, vol 3292 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2004) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-540-30470-8_72>

  • Bates F, ‘Benefits for Handicapped Children in Australian Social Security Law: A Disaster in Statutory Interpretation and Reform’ (1990) 11 Statute Law Review 108

  • Bayamlıoğlu E and Leenes R, ‘The “Rule of Law” Implications of Data-Driven Decision-Making: A Techno-Regulatory Perspective’ (2018) 10 Law, Innovation and Technology 295

  • Belli, L, Venturini, J “Private ordering and the rise of terms of service as cyber-regulation” (2016) 5 Internet Policy Review

  • Bench-Capon T and Prakken H, ‘Introducing the Logic and Law Corner’ (2007) 18 Journal of Logic and Computation 1

  • Bench-Capon T and Sartor G, ‘Theory Based Explanation of Case Law Domains: 38’, Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law - ICAIL ’01 (ACM Press 2001) <http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=383535.383537>

  • Bench-Capon TJM and Coenen FP, ‘Isomorphism and Legal Knowledge Based Systems’ (1992) 1 Artificial Intelligence and Law 65

  • Bench-Capon TJM and Visser PRS, ‘Ontologies in Legal Information Systems; the Need for Explicit Specifications of Domain Conceptualisations’, Proceedings of the sixth international conference on Artificial intelligence and law - ICAIL ’97 (ACM Press 1997) <http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=261618.261646>

  • Benjamins R (ed), Law and the Semantic Web: Legal Ontologies, Methodologies, Legal Information Retrieval, and Applications (1st ed, Springer 2005)

  • Bermon E and Narboux J-P (eds), Finding One’s Way Through Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations: New Essays on §§1-88, vol 2 (Springer International Publishing 2017) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-63507-1>

  • Bernards N and Campbell-Verduyn M, ‘Understanding Technological Change in Global Finance through Infrastructures: Introduction to Review of International Political Economy Special Issue “The Changing Technological Infrastructures of Global Finance”’ (2019) 26 Review of International Political Economy 773

  • Bert-Jaap Koops “Criteria for Normative Technology: The Acceptability of “Code as Law” in Light of Democratic and Constitutional Values” in R Brownsword and K Yeung (eds) Regulating Technologies: Legal futures, Regulatory Frames and Technological Fixes (Oxford; Portland, Or: Hart, 2008).

  • Bhattacharyya A, Chittimalli PK and Naik R, ‘An Approach to Mine Business Rule Intents from Domain-Specific Documents’, Proceedings of the 10th Innovations in Software Engineering Conference (ACM 2017) <https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3021460.3021470>

  • Blycha N and Garside A, ‘Smart Legal Contracts: A Model for the Integration of Machine Capabilities Into Contracts’ [2020] SSRN Electronic Journal <https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3743932>

  • Boella G and others, ‘Managing Legal Interpretation in Regulatory Compliance’, Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law - ICAIL ’13 (ACM Press 2013) <http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2514601.2514605>

  • Brandon PS, Kocatürk T and RICS Foundation (eds), Virtual Futures for Design, Construction & Procurement (Blackwell Pub 2008)

  • Brown I, Research Handbook on Governance of the Internet (Edward Elgar Publishing 2013) <http://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781849805025.xml>

  • Brownsword R, ‘Code, Control, and Choice: Why East Is East and West Is West’ (2005) 25 Legal Studies 1

  • Brownsword R, Rights, Regulation, and the Technological Revolution (Oxford University Press 2008) <http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276806.001.0001/acprof-9780199276806>

  • Brownsword R, ‘Why I Wrote … Rights, Regulation, and the Technological Revolution’ (2011) 6 Clinical Ethics 207

  • Brownsword R, ‘The Shaping of Our On-Line Worlds: Getting the Regulatory Environment Right’ (2012) 20 International Journal of Law and Information Technology 249

  • Brownsword R, ‘In the Year 2061: From Law to Technological Management’ (2015) 7 Law, Innovation and Technology 1

  • Brownsword R, ‘Technological Management and the Rule of Law’ (2016) 8 Law, Innovation and Technology 100

  • Brownsword R, Law, Technology and Society: Re-Imagining the Regulatory Environment (Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2019)

  • Brüninghaus S and Ashley KD, ‘Improving the Representation of Legal Case Texts with Information Extraction Methods’, Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law - ICAIL ’01 (ACM Press 2001) <http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=383535.383540>

  • Bulles J, Bouwmeester H and Ausems A, ‘A Best Practice for the Analysis of Legal Documents’ in Christophe Debruyne and others (eds), On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2019 Workshops, vol 11878 (Springer International Publishing 2020) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-40907-4_11>

  • Butenko A and Larouche P, ‘Regulation for Innovativeness or Regulation of Innovation?’ (2015) 7 Law, Innovation and Technology 52

  • Calvary G and others, ‘Envisioning Advanced User Interfaces for E-Government Applications: A Case Study’ in Saïd Assar, Imed Boughzala and Isabelle Boydens (eds), Practical Studies in E-Government (Springer New York 2011) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4419-7533-1_12>

  • Campbell CM and McGurk J, ‘Revising Statutes with Computer Support’ (1987) 8 Statute law review 104

  • Cao D, ‘Inter-Lingual Uncertainty in Bilingual and Multilingual Law’ (2007) 39 Journal of Pragmatics 69

  • Casellas N, Legal Ontology Engineering (Springer Netherlands 2011) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-007-1497-7>

  • Cath C, ‘Governing Artificial Intelligence: Ethical, Legal and Technical Opportunities and Challenges’ (2018) 376 Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 20180080

  • Chiu IH-Y, ‘A Rational Regulatory Strategy for Governing Financial Innovation’ (2017) 8 European Journal of Risk Regulation 743

  • Ciaghi A and Villafiorita A, ‘Improving Public Administrations via Law Modeling and BPR’ in Radu Popescu-Zeletin and others (eds), E-Infrastuctures and E-Services for Developing Countries, vol 64 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2011) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-23828-4_7>

  • Clarke R and Greenleaf G, ‘Dataveillance Regulation: A Research Framework’ [2017] SSRN Electronic Journal <https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3073492>

  • Condon BJ, ‘The Concordance of Multilingual Legal Texts at the WTO’ (2012) 33 Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 525

  • Conry EJ and Beck-Dudley CL, ‘Meta-Jurisprudence: A Paradigm For Legal Studies’ (1996) 33 American Business Law Journal 691

  • Currie WL, Gozman DP and Seddon JJM, ‘Dialectic Tensions in the Financial Markets: A Longitudinal Study of Pre- and Post-Crisis Regulatory Technology’ (2018) 33 Journal of Information Technology 304

  • Das SR, ‘The Future of Fintech’ (2019) 48 Financial Management 981

  • de Carvalho EM, Semiotics of International Law, vol 91 (Springer Netherlands 2011) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-90-481-9011-9>

  • De Filippi P, Blockchain and the Law: The Rule of Code (Harvard University Press 2018)

  • De Vos M, Padget J and Satoh K, ‘Legal Modelling and Reasoning Using Institutions’ in Takashi Onada, Daisuke Bekki and Eric McCready (eds), New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, vol 6797 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2011) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-25655-4_12>

  • Deakin S and Markou C (eds), Is Law Computable?: Critical Perspectives on Law and Artificial Intelligence (Hart Publishing 2020) <http://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/is-law-computable-critical-perspectives-on-law-and-artificial-intelligence>

  • Delacroix S, ‘Computer Systems Fit for the Legal Profession?’ (2018) 21 Legal Ethics 119

  • Dhouib K and Gargouri F, ‘A Textual Jurisprudence Decision Structuring Methodology Based on Extraction Patterns and Arabic Legal Ontology’ (2014) 23 Journal of Decision Systems 69

  • Dhouib K and Gargouri F, ‘A Textual Jurisprudence Decision Structuring Methodology Based on Extraction Patterns and Arabic Legal Ontology’ (2014) 23 Journal of Decision Systems 69

  • Dickerson, R, “The Diseases of Legislative Language” (1964) 1 Harv J on Legis 5

  • Dimyadi J and others, ‘Maintainable Process Model Driven Online Legal Expert Systems’ (2019) 27 Artificial Intelligence and Law 93

  • Dirk A Zetzsche and others, ‘Regulating A Revolution: From Regulatory Sandboxes To Smart Regulation’ (2018) 23 Fordham journal of corporate & financial law 31

  • Distinto I, Guarino N and Masolo C, ‘A Well-Founded Ontological Framework for Modeling Personal Income Tax’, Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law - ICAIL ’13 (ACM Press 2013) <http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2514601.2514606>

  • Diver L, ‘Law as a User: Design, Affordance, and the Technological Mediation of Norms’ (2018) 15 SCRIPT-ed 4

  • Dodova L, ‘A Translator Looks at English Law’ (1989) 10 Statute Law Review 69

  • Doherty M, ‘Comprehensibility as a Rule of Law Requirement: The Role of Legal Design in Delivering Access to Law’ (2020) 8 Journal of Open Access to Law <https://ojs.law.cornell.edu/index.php/joal/article/view/100>

  • Doya NR, ‘Ambiguity in the Definition: The Need for Caution in Prosecuting Persons Under the Anti-Pornography Act’ (2020) 41 Statute Law Review 320

  • Drummond N and others, ‘A Practical Introduction to Protégé OWL’ 118

  • Ducato R, ‘De Iurisprudentia Picturata: Brief Notes on Law and Visualisation’ (2019) 7 Journal of Open Access to Law <https://ojs.law.cornell.edu/index.php/joal/article/view/98>

  • Dulfer D, Nijssen S and Lokin M, ‘Developing and Maintaining Durable Specifications for Law or Regulation Based Services’ in Ioana Ciuciu and others (eds), On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2015 Workshops, vol 9416 (Springer International Publishing 2015) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-26138-6_20>

  • Eder J and Koncilia C, ‘Modelling Changes in Ontologies’ in Robert Meersman, Zahir Tari and Angelo Corsaro (eds), On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2004: OTM 2004 Workshops, vol 3292 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2004) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-540-30470-8_77>

  • Eriksson M, ‘The Normativity of Automated Driving: A Case Study of Embedding Norms in Technology’ (2017) 26 Information & Communications Technology Law 46

  • Esposito F, ‘Nudge and the Law: A European Perspective by Alberto Alemanno and Anne-Lise Sibony (Eds) Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2015, 336 Pp. € 50; Hardcover’ (2015) 6 European Journal of Risk Regulation 331

  • Ferreri S, ‘Law, Language and Translation in Multilingual Contexts’ (2014) 25 King’s Law Journal 271

  • Filippi PD and Hassan S, ‘Blockchain Technology as a Regulatory Technology: From Code Is Law to Law Is Code’ [2016] First Monday <https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/7113>

  • Floridi L, ‘Soft Ethics, the Governance of the Digital and the General Data Protection Regulation’ (2018) 376 Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 20180081

  • French R, ‘The Principle of Legality and Legislative Intention’ (2019) 40 Statute Law Review 40

  • Frug S, ‘Toward Inclusive Design for Visual Law’ (2019) 7 Journal of Open Access to Law <https://ojs.law.cornell.edu/index.php/joal/article/view/93>

  • Gavaghan’ C, ‘Lex Machina: Techno-Regulatory Mechanisms and “Rules by Design”’ (2017) 15 Otago Law Review 25

  • Gavaghan C and others, Government Use of Artificial Intelligence in New Zealand: Final Report on Phase 1 of the New Zealand Law Foundation’s Artificial Intelligence and Law in New Zealand Project (2019, University of Otago)

  • Geyh CG (ed), ‘6. Looking for Law in All the Wrong Places: Some Suggestions for Modeling Legal Decision-Making’, What’s Law Got to Do With It? (Stanford University Press 2020) <https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9780804782128-009/html>

  • Ghanavati S, ‘Legal-URN Framework for Legal Compliance of Business Processes’ (ProQuest Dissertations Publishing 2013) <https://search.proquest.com/docview/1354442876?pq-origsite=primo>

  • Glazebrook, S “Do they say what they mean and mean what they say? Some issues in statutory interpretation in the 21st century” OtaLawRw 7; (2015) 14 Otago LR 61.

  • Goldini M, “The Politics of Code as Law: Toward Input Reasons” in J Reichel and AS Lind (eds) Freedom of Expression, the Internet and Democracy (Leiden: Brill, 2015)

  • Goodenough OR, ‘Generativity: Making Law a More Open Institutional “Ecosystem” for Productive Innovation’ [2015] SSRN Electronic Journal <http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=2589263>

  • Goodrich P, ‘Screening Law’ (2009) 21 Law and Literature 1

  • Governatori G and others, ‘On Legal Contracts, Imperative and Declarative Smart Contracts, and Blockchain Systems’ (2018) 26 Artificial Intelligence and Law 377

  • Grabmair M and Ashley K, ‘Towards Modeling Systematic Interpretation of Codified Law’ (2005)

  • Green S, ‘Computer Code as Law: A New Frontier?’ (Torts, 5 August 2019) <https://torts.jotwell.com/computer-code-as-law-a-new-frontier/>

  • Greenleaf G, Mowbray A and Chung P, ‘Building Sustainable Free Legal Advisory Systems: Experiences from the History of AI & Law’ (2018) 34 Computer Law & Security Review 314

  • Greenleaf G, Mowbray A and Chung P, ‘Strengthening Development of Rules As Code: Submission to the OECD’s OPSI on Cracking the Code’ [2020] SSRN Electronic Journal <https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3638771>

  • Greenleaf G, Mowbray A and Tyree A, ‘Legal Expert Systems: Words, Words Words … ?’ (1987) 3 International review of law, computers & technology 119

  • Greenleaf G, Mowbray A and van Dijk P, ‘Representing and Using Legal Knowledge in Integrated Decision Support Systems: DataLex WorkStations’ (1995) 3 Artificial Intelligence and Law 97

  • Grimmelman J, ‘The Platform Is the Message’ (2018) 2 Georgetown Law Technology Review 217 <https://georgetownlawtechreview.org/the-platform-is-the-message/GLTR-07-2018/>

  • Grimmelmann J, ‘Regulation by Software’ [2005] Student Prize Papers <https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylsspps_papers/46>

  • Hadfield GK, ‘The Problem of Social Order: What Should We Count as Law?’ (2017) 42 Law & Social Inquiry 16

  • Hadfield GK and Weingast BR, ‘Law without the State: Legal Attributes and the Coordination of Decentralized Collective Punishment’ (2013) 1 Journal of Law and Courts 3

  • Hage JC, ‘Formalizing Legal Coherence’, Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law - ICAIL ’01 (ACM Press 2001) <http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=383535.383538>

  • Harambam J, Helberger N and van Hoboken J, ‘Democratizing Algorithmic News Recommenders: How to Materialize Voice in a Technologically Saturated Media Ecosystem’ (2018) 376 Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 20180088

  • Haynes J, ‘Legislative Approaches to Combating “Revenge Porn”: A Multijurisdictional Perspective’ (2018) 39 Statute Law Review 319

  • Henderson J and Bench-Capon T, ‘Dynamic Arguments in a Case Law Domain’, Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law - ICAIL ’01 (ACM Press 2001) <http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=383535.383542>

  • Hildebrandt M, ‘Ambient Intelligence, Criminal Liability and Democracy’ (2008) 2 Criminal Law and Philosophy 163

  • Hildebrandt M, ‘Legal Protection by Design: Objections and Refutations’ (2011) 5 Legisprudence 223

  • Hildebrandt M, ‘Law as Information in the Era of Data-Driven Agency: Law as Information’ (2016) 79 The Modern Law Review 1

  • Hildebrandt M, ‘Saved by Design? The Case of Legal Protection by Design’ (2017) 11 NanoEthics 307

  • Hildebrandt M Law for Computer Scientists and other folk (1st ed, Oxford University Press, 2020)

  • Hildebrandt M, ‘Algorithmic Regulation and the Rule of Law’ (2018) 376 Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 20170355

  • Hildebrandt M, ‘Privacy as Protection of the Incomputable Self: From Agnostic to Agonistic Machine Learning’ (2019) 20 Theoretical Inquiries in Law 83

  • Hildebrandt M, ‘The Adaptive Nature of Text-Driven Law’ (2021) 1 Journal of Cross-disciplinary Research in Computational Law https://journalcrcl.org/crcl/article/view/2

  • Hildebrandt M and Koops B-J, ‘The Challenges of Ambient Law and Legal Protection in the Profiling Era: The Challenges of Ambient Law and Legal Protection in the Profiling Era’ (2010) 73 Modern Law Review 428

  • Hildebrandt M and Tielemans L, ‘Data Protection by Design and Technology Neutral Law’ (2013) 29 Computer Law & Security Review 509

  • Hoeflich MH, ‘Law & Geometry: Legal Science from Leibniz to Langdell’ (1986) 30 The American Journal of Legal History 95

  • Hoekstra R and others, ‘LKIF Core: Principled Ontology Development for the Legal Domain.’ (2009)

  • Hoffmann-Riem W, ‘Legal Technology/Computational Law’ 16

  • Höfler S, ‘Between Conciseness and Transparency: Presuppositions in Legislative Texts’ (2014) 27 International Journal for the Semiotics of Law
    • Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 627
  • Iman N, ‘The Rise and Rise of Financial Technology: The Good, the Bad, and the Verdict’ (2020) 7 Cogent Business & Management 1725309

  • Jamieson N, ‘The Last Indian Summer of Soviet Law Reform: Part II’ (1995) 16 Statute Law Review 125

  • Jamieson NJ, ‘The Pathology of Legislation’ (1984) 5 Statute Law Review 87

  • Jamieson NJ, ‘Getting in on the Act—Antipodean Style’ (1994) 15 Statute Law Review 192

  • Jarrar M and Gangemi A, ‘Workshop on Regulatory Ontologies (WORM) PC Co-Chairs’ Message’ in Robert Meersman, Zahir Tari and Angelo Corsaro (eds), On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2004: OTM 2004 Workshops, vol 3292 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2004) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-540-30470-8_69>

  • Jemielniak J and Miklaszewicz P (eds), Interpretation of Law in the Global World: From Particularism to a Universal Approach (Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2010) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-04886-9>

  • Jeremy M Sklaroff, ‘Smart Contracts And The Cost Of Inflexibility’ (2017) 166 University of Pennsylvania law review 263

  • Johnsen Å and Berre A-J, ‘A Bridge between Legislator and Technologist - Formalization in SBVR for Improved Quality and Understanding of Legal Rules’ < https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.372.7775&rep=rep1&type=pdf>

  • Kaeseberg T, ‘The Code-Ification of Law and Its Potential Effects’ (2019) 20 Computer Law Review International 107

  • Karpf J, ‘Inductive Modelling in Law: Example Based Expert Systems in Administrative Law’, Proceedings of the third international conference on Artificial intelligence and law - ICAIL ’91 (ACM Press 1991) <http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=112646.112684>

  • Kassoff M and Genesereth MR, ‘PrediCalc: A Logical Spreadsheet Management System’ (2007) 22 The Knowledge Engineering Review 281

  • Kavame Eroglu ZG, ‘The Political Economy of International Standard Setting in Financial Reporting: How the United States Led the Adoption of IFRS Across the World’ [2017] SSRN Electronic Journal <https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3079256>

  • Khadraoui A and others, ‘Law-Based Ontology for E-Government Services Construction – Case Study: The Specification of Services in Relationship with the Venture Creation in Switzerland’ in Saïd Assar, Imed Boughzala and Isabelle Boydens (eds), Practical Studies in E-Government (Springer New York 2011) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4419-7533-1_9>

  • Kishida K, ‘Categories for Dynamic Epistemic Logic’ (2017) 251 Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 353

  • Kitchin R, ‘Thinking Critically about and Researching Algorithms’ (2017) 20 Information, Communication & Society 14

  • Knackstedt R, Heddier M and Becker J, ‘Conceptual Modeling in Law: An Interdisciplinary Research Agenda’ (2014) 34 Communications of the Association for Information Systems <https://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol34/iss1/36>

  • Koops B-J, Hoepman J-H and Leenes R, ‘Open-Source Intelligence and Privacy by Design’ (2013) 29 Computer Law & Security Review 676

  • Koops B-J and Leenes R, ‘Privacy Regulation Cannot Be Hardcoded. A Critical Comment on the “Privacy by Design” Provision in Data-Protection Law’ (2014) 28 International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 159

  • Kroll JA, ‘The Fallacy of Inscrutability’ (2018) 376 Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 20180084

  • Kuhn T, ‘A Survey and Classification of Controlled Natural Languages’ (2014) 40 Computational Linguistics 121

  • Ladleif J and Weske M, ‘A Unifying Model of Legal Smart Contracts’ in Alberto HF Laender and others (eds), Conceptual Modeling, vol 11788 (Springer International Publishing 2019) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-33223-5_27>

  • Laender AHF and others (eds), Conceptual Modeling: 38th International Conference, ER 2019, Salvador, Brazil, November 4–7, 2019, Proceedings, vol 11788 (Springer International Publishing 2019) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-33223-5>

  • Lawrence Lessig, ‘The Limits in Open Code: Regulatory Standards and the Future of the Net’ (1999) 14 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 759

  • Leenes R, ‘Framing Techno-Regulation: An Exploration of State and Non-State Regulation by Technology’ (2011) 5 Legisprudence 143

  • Leff LL, ‘Automated Reasoning with Legal XML Documents’, Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law - ICAIL ’01 (ACM Press 2001) <http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=383535.383560>

  • Leith P, ‘Fundamental Errors in Legal Logic Programming’ (1986) 29 Computer journal 545

  • Leith P, ‘The Rise and Fall of the Legal Expert System’ (2016) 30 International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 94

  • Leone V, Di Caro L and Villata S, ‘Taking Stock of Legal Ontologies: A Feature-Based Comparative Analysis’ (2020) 28 Artificial Intelligence and Law 207

  • Lepofsky MD and Graham RNM, ‘Universal Design in Legislation: Eliminating Barriers for People with Disabilities’ (2009) 30 Statute Law Review 97

  • Lessig L, ‘The Path of Cyberlaw’ (1995) 104 The Yale Law Journal 1743

  • Lessig L, ‘Law Regulating Code Regulating Law’ <http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12912675>

  • Lessig L, Code (Version 20, Basic Books 2006)

  • Lettieri N and others, ‘Ex Machina: Analytical Platforms, Law and the Challenges of Computational Legal Science’ (2018) 10 Future Internet 37

  • Lettieri N and others, ‘Platform Economy and Techno-Regulation—Experimenting with Reputation and Nudge’ (2019) 11 Future Internet 163

  • Leung J, ‘Statutory Interpretation in Multilingual Jurisdictions: Typology and Trends’ (2012) 33 Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 481

  • Li T and others, ‘A Model-Based Approach to the Automatic Revision of Secondary Legislation’, Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law - ICAIL ’13 (ACM Press 2013) <http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2514601.2514627>

  • Li WP and others, ‘Law Is Code: A Software Engineering Approach to Analyzing the United States Code’ [2014] SSRN Electronic Journal <http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=2511947>

  • Llorente S, Rodríguez E and Delgado J, ‘Workflow Description of Digital Rights Management Systems’ in Robert Meersman, Zahir Tari and Angelo Corsaro (eds), On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2004: OTM 2004 Workshops, vol 3292 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2004) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-540-30470-8_71>

  • Loevinger L, ‘Jurimetrics The Next Step Forward’ (1971) 12 Jurimetrics Journal 3

  • Lokin M, Nijssen S and Lemmens I, ‘CogniLex’ in Ioana Ciuciu and others (eds), On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2015 Workshops, vol 9416 (Springer International Publishing 2015) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-26138-6_27>

  • Ly LT and others, ‘On Enabling Integrated Process Compliance with Semantic Constraints in Process Management Systems: Requirements, Challenges, Solutions’ (2012) 14 Information Systems Frontiers 195

  • Lynch A and Ziegler P, ‘The Amendment of Legislation’ (1991) 12 Statute Law Review 48

  • Macaulay M and Lawton A, ‘Changing the Standards? Assessing the Impact of the Committee for Standards in Public Life on Local Government in England’ (2006) 59 Parliamentary Affairs 474

  • Magrani E, ‘Threats of the Internet of Things in a Techno-Regulated Society: A New Legal Challenge of the Information Revolution’ (2018) 9 International Journal of Private Law 4

  • Marino S and others (eds), Language and Law: The Role of Language and Translation in EU Competition Law (Springer International Publishing 2018) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-90905-9>

  • Maume P, ‘Regulating Robo-Advisory’ [2018] SSRN Electronic Journal <https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3167137>

  • McAuliffe K, ‘Hybrid Texts and Uniform Law? The Multilingual Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union’ (2011) 24 International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 97

  • McAuliffe K, ‘The Limitations of a Multilingual Legal System’ (2013) 26 International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 861

  • McCarty LT, ‘Some Arguments about Legal Arguments’, Proceedings of the sixth international conference on Artificial intelligence and law - ICAIL ’97 (ACM Press 1997) <http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=261618.261656>

  • McGibbney LJ and Kumar B, ‘An Intelligent Authoring Model for Subsidiary Legislation and Regulatory Instrument Drafting within Construction and Engineering Industry’ (2013) 35 Automation in Construction 121

  • Melz E and Valente A, ‘Modeling the Tax Code’ in Robert Meersman, Zahir Tari and Angelo Corsaro (eds), On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2004: OTM 2004 Workshops, vol 3292 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2004) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-540-30470-8_76>

  • Meyer A, ‘Mireille Hildebrandt and Jeanne Gaakeer: Human Law and Computer Law: Comparative Perspectives’ (2015) 9 Pólemos <https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/pol-2015-0029/html>

  • Micheler E and Whaley A, ‘Regulatory Technology: Replacing Law with Computer Code’ (2020) 21 European Business Organization Law Review 349

  • Miers D, ‘Legislation, Linguistic Adequacy and Public Policy’ (1986) 7 Statute Law Review 90

  • Miers D and Page A, ‘Teaching Legislation in Law Schools’ (1980) 1 Statute Law Review 23

  • Miller AS, ‘Statutory Language and the Purposive Use of Ambiguity’ (1956) 42 Virginia Law Review 23

  • Minto A, Voelkerling M and Wulff M, ‘Separating Apples from Oranges: Identifying Threats to Financial Stability Originating from FinTech’ (2017) 12 Capital Markets Law Journal 428

  • Morgan D, ‘Technology in the Age of Anxiety – the Moral Economy of Regulation’ (2009) 29 Legal Studies 492

  • Morris J, ‘Spreadsheets for Legal Reasoning: The Continued Promise of Declarative Logic Programming in Law’ [2020] SSRN Electronic Journal <https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3577239>

  • Morrison AS, ‘Case Law, Systematic Law, and a Very Modest Suggestion’ (2014) 35 Statute Law Review 159

  • Myer W, ‘Get on the Scene Like a Tax Machine’ (2019) 19 Legal Information Management 61

  • Nadel MS, ‘Computer Code vs. Legal Code: Setting the Rules in Cyberspace’ (2000) 52(3) Federal Communications Law Journal article 19.

  • Nakamoto S, ‘Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System’ <https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf>

  • Neil M and others, ‘Modelling Competing Legal Arguments Using Bayesian Model Comparison and Averaging’ (2019) 27 Artificial Intelligence and Law 403

  • New Zealand Law Commission, Presentation of New Zealand Statute Law: In Conjunction with Parliamentary Counsel Office. (Law Commission 2008)

  • New Zealand Government, Algorithm Assessment Report. (2018) <https://www.data.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/Algorithm-Assessment-Report-Oct-2018.pdf>

  • Novikova GM, Azofeifa EJ and Milov VR, ‘Towards the Formalization of Contradictions in a Legal Multiagent System’ (2019) 150 Procedia Computer Science 488

  • Ogawa Y and others, ‘Design and Compilation of Syntactically Tagged Corpus of Japanese Statutory Sentences’ in Takashi Onada, Daisuke Bekki and Eric McCready (eds), New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, vol 6797 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2011) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-25655-4_13>

  • Omotubora A and Basu S, ‘Regulation for E-Payment Systems: Analytical Approaches Beyond Private Ordering’ (2018) 62 Journal of African Law 281

  • ‘On Legislative Expression, or the Language of the Written Law. By George Coode of the Inner Temple’ (1846) 84 Edinburgh review (1802) 117

  • Onada T, Bekki D and McCready E (eds), New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, vol 6797 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2011) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-25655-4>

  • Pagallo U, ‘Apples, Oranges, Robots: Four Misunderstandings in Today’s Debate on the Legal Status of AI Systems’ (2018) 376 Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 20180168

  • Pagallo U, Casanovas P and Madelin R, ‘The Middle-out Approach: Assessing Models of Legal Governance in Data Protection, Artificial Intelligence, and the Web of Data’ (2019) 7 The Theory and Practice of Legislation 1

  • Paik W and Lee JY, ‘Extracting Legal Propositions from Appellate Decisions with Text Discourse Analysis Methods’ in Robert Meersman, Zahir Tari and Angelo Corsaro (eds), On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2004: OTM 2004 Workshops, vol 3292 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2004) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-540-30470-8_74>

  • Palmer J, ‘Legal Merit Arguments, Legal Semiotics and the Design of Legal Knowledge-Based Systems’, Proceedings of the sixth international conference on Artificial intelligence and law - ICAIL ’97 (ACM Press 1997) <http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=261618.261653>

  • Palmirani M and others, ‘LegalRuleML: XML-Based Rules and Norms’ in Frank Olken, Monica Palmirani and Davide Sottara (eds), Rule-Based Modeling and Computing on the Semantic Web, vol 7018 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2011) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-24908-2_30>

  • Pasquale F, ‘A Rule of Persons, Not Machines: The Limits of Legal Automation’ (2019) 87 The George Washington law review 1

  • Paul J, The Legal Realism of Jerome N. Frank (Springer Netherlands 1959) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-011-9493-8>

  • Pearson A and Tranter K, ‘Code, Nintendo’s Super Mario and Digital Legality’ (2015) 28 International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 825

  • Petersen J, ‘Is Code Speech? Law and the Expressivity of Machine Language’ (2015) 17 New Media & Society 415

  • Petit N, ‘Artificial Intelligence and Automated Law Enforcement: A Review Paper’ [2018] SSRN Electronic Journal <https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3145133>

  • Plaxton M, ‘Reflections on Waldron’s Archetypes’ (2011) 30 Law and Philosophy 77

  • Puschmann T, ‘Fintech’ (2017) 59 Business & Information Systems Engineering 69

  • Quaresma P and Rodrigues I, ‘Using Logic Programming to Model Multi-Agent Web Legal Systems – an Application Report’, Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law - ICAIL ’01 (ACM Press 2001) <http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=383535.383558>

  • Quigley M, ‘Nudging For Health: On Public Policy And Designing Choice Architecture’ (2013) 21 Medical Law Review 588

  • Radbruch G, ‘Five Minutes of Legal Philosophy (1945)’ (2006) 26 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 13

  • Radin, MJ “Regulation by Contract, Regulation by Machine” (2004) 160 JITE 142 to 156

  • Ramakrishna S, Górski Ł and Paschke A, ‘A Dialogue between a Lawyer and Computer Scientist: The Evaluation of Knowledge Transformation from Legal Text to Computer-Readable Format’ (2016) 30 Applied Artificial Intelligence 216

  • Ramakrishna S, Górski Ł and Paschke A, ‘KR4IPLaw Judgment Miner - Case-Law Mining for Legal Norm Annotation’ in Ugo Pagallo and others (eds), AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems, vol 10791 (Springer International Publishing 2018) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-00178-0_22>

  • Reese, Sarah J “Rebuilding Babel: Negotiating Meaning in Multilingual Legislation” [2015] NZLawStuJl 9; (2015) 3 NZLSJ 589’ <http://www.nzlii.org/nz/journals/NZLawStuJl/2015/9.html>

  • Waye, V C, ‘Regtech: A New Frontier in Legal Scholarship’ <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3489648>

  • Reidenberg JR, ‘Lex Informatica: The Formulation of Information Policy Rules through Technology’ (1998) 76 Texas Law Review 553

  • Revell DL, ‘Bilingual Legislation: The Ontario Experience’ (1998) 19 Statute Law Review 32

  • Revell DL, ‘Enhancing the Legislative Process: The Value of the Legislative Drafter’ (2011) 32 Statute Law Review 149

  • Ricoeur P, ‘The Later Wittgenstein and the Later Husserl on Language’ (2014) 5 Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies 28

  • Rissland EL, Ashley KD and Loui RP, ‘AI and Law: A Fruitful Synergy’ (2003) 150 Artificial Intelligence 1

  • Robertson C, ‘Multilingual Legislation in the European Union. EU and National Legislative-Language Styles and Terminology’ (2011) 9 Research in Language 51

  • Rodrigues CM de O and others, ‘Legal Ontologies over Time: A Systematic Mapping Study’ (2019) 130 Expert Systems with Applications 12

  • Roscoe Pound, ‘Mechanical Jurisprudence’ (1908) 8 Columbia law review 605

  • Ross RG, ‘Decision Analysis: A Primer’ [2013] Decision Analysis

  • Ross RG, ‘Tabulation Of Lists In Rulespeak®: A Primer’

  • Roth B and Verheij B, ‘Cases and Dialectical Arguments – An Approach to Case-Based Reasoning’ in Robert Meersman, Zahir Tari and Angelo Corsaro (eds), On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2004: OTM 2004 Workshops, vol 3292 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2004) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-540-30470-8_75>

  • Roznai Y and Mordechay N, ‘Access to Justice 2.0: Access to Legislation And Beyond’ (2015) 3 The Theory and Practice of Legislation 333

  • Sagri M-T, Tiscornia D and Gangemi A, ‘An Ontology-Based Model for Representing “Bundle-of-Rights”’ in Robert Meersman, Zahir Tari and Angelo Corsaro (eds), On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2004: OTM 2004 Workshops, vol 3292 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2004) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-540-30470-8_78>

  • Ross RG, Sakhaee N and Wilson MC, ‘Information Extraction Framework to Build Legislation Network’ (2021) 29 Artificial Intelligence and Law 35

  • Samuels A, ‘Consolidation: A Plea’ (2005) 26 Statute Law Review 56

  • Schafer B, ‘Formal Models of Statutory Interpretation in Multilingual Legal Systems’ (2017) 38 Statute Law Review 310

  • Schartum DW, ‘Law and Algorithms in the Public Domain’ (2016) 10 Etikk i praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 15

  • School SL, ‘The Politics of Legislative Drafting: A Congressional Case Study’ (Stanford Law School) <https://law.stanford.edu/publications/the-politics-of-legislative-drafting-a-congressional-case-study/>

  • Schueffel P, ‘Taming the Beast: A Scientific Definition of Fintech’ 24

  • Schultz, W, Dankert, K “Governance by things” as a challenge to regulation by law” (2020) 5 Internet Policy Review 2

  • Sergot MJ and others, ‘The British Nationality Act as a Logic Program’ (1986) 29 Communications of the ACM 370

  • Shobe J, ‘Intertemporal Statutory Interpretation and the Evolution of Legislative Drafting’ (2014) 114 Columbia Law Review 807

  • Sin KK, ‘Out of the Fly-Bottle: Conceptual Confusions in Multilingual Legislation’ (2013) 26 International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 927

  • Slocum BG, ‘Linguistics and “Ordinary Meaning” Determinations’ (2012) 33 Statute Law Review 39

  • Soares AA, Martins PV and da Silva AR, ‘LegalLanguage: A Domain-Specific Language for Legal Contexts’ in David Aveiro, Giancarlo Guizzardi and José Borbinha (eds), Advances in Enterprise Engineering XIII, vol 374 (Springer International Publishing 2020) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-37933-9_3>

  • Soltana G and others, ‘Model-Based Simulation of Legal Policies: Framework, Tool Support, and Validation’ (2018) 17 Software & Systems Modeling 851

  • Stark J, ‘Should the Main Goal of Statutory Drafting Be Accuracy or Clarity?’ (1994) 15 Statute Law Review 207

  • Stewart G, ‘Legislative Drafting and the Marginal Note’ (1995) 16 Statute Law Review 21

  • Surden H, ‘Values Embedded in Legal Artificial Intelligence’ [2017] SSRN Electronic Journal <https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=2932333>

  • Surden H, Genesereth M and Logu B, ‘Representational Complexity in Law’, Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law - ICAIL ’07 (ACM Press 2007) <http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1276318.1276355>

  • Susskind RE, ‘Expert Systems In Law: A Jurisprudential Approach To Artificial Intelligence And Legal Reasoning’ (1986) 49 The Modern Law Review 168

  • Thomas S, ‘Law, Smart Technology, and Circular Economy: All Watched over by Machines of Loving Grace?’ (2018) 10 Law, Innovation and Technology 230

  • Tiscornia D and Turchi F, ‘Formalization of Legislative Documents Based on a Functional Model’, Proceedings of the sixth international conference on Artificial intelligence and law - ICAIL ’97 (ACM Press 1997) <http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=261618.261633>

  • Tsampoulatidis I, Tzovaras D and Strintzis MG, ‘Ontology-Based E-Government Thematic Services Based on Topic Maps’ in Robert Meersman, Zahir Tari and Angelo Corsaro (eds), On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2004: OTM 2004 Workshops, vol 3292 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2004) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-540-30470-8_70>

  • Turnbull IML, ‘Clear Legislative Drafting: New Approaches in Australia’ (1990) 11 Statute Law Review 161

  • van den Berg B, ‘Robots as Tools for Techno-Regulation’ (2011) 3 Law, Innovation and Technology 319

  • van den Berg B and Keymolen E, ‘Regulating Security on the Internet: Control versus Trust’ (2017) 31 International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 188

  • van Engers TM and others, ‘POWER: Using UML/OCL for Modeling Legislation - an Application Report’, Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law - ICAIL ’01 (ACM Press 2001) <http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=383535.383554>

  • Van Gestel R and Menting M-C, ‘Ex Ante Evaluation and Alternatives to Legislation: Going Dutch?’ (2011) 32 Statute Law Review 209

  • Vismann C and Krajewski M, ‘Computer Juridisms’ [2007] Grey Room

  • Waldron J, ‘Thoughtfulness and the Rule of Law’ [2011] SSRN Electronic Journal <http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1759550>

  • Waltl B, Reschenhofer T and Matthes F, ‘Modeling, Execution and Analysis of Formalized Legal Norms in Model Based Decision Structures’ in Ugo Pagallo and others (eds), AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems, vol 10791 (Springer International Publishing 2018) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-00178-0_10>

  • Walton D, Sartor G and Macagno F, ‘An Argumentation Framework for Contested Cases of Statutory Interpretation’ (2016) 24 Artificial Intelligence and Law 51

  • Watson-Brown A, ‘In Search of Plain English–The Holy Grail or Mythical Excalibur of Legislative Drafting’ (2012) 33 Statute Law Review 7

  • Webb TE and Geyer R, ‘The Drafters’ Dance: The Complexity of Drafting Legislation and the Limitations of “Plain Language” and “Good Law” Initiatives’ (2020) 41 Statute Law Review 129

  • Weber RH, ‘“Rose Is a Rose Is a Rose Is a Rose” – What about Code and Law?’ (2018) 34 Computer Law & Security Review 701

  • Winfield AFT and Jirotka M, ‘Ethical Governance Is Essential to Building Trust in Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Systems’ (2018) 376 Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 20180085

  • Wintgens, LJ “Freedom and Legisprudence – a more substantial view: a reply to Professor Perju” (2009) 89 BU L Rev 427

  • Wintgens, LJ “Legisprudence as a New Theory of Legislation” (2006) 19 Ratio Juris 1 to 25

  • Wu T, ‘When Code Isn’t Law’ (2003) 89 Va. L. Rev. 679

  • Wyner A, ‘An Ontology in OWL for Legal Case-Based Reasoning’ (2008) 16 Artificial Intelligence and Law 361

  • Yeung K, ‘Regulation by Blockchain: The Emerging Battle for Supremacy between the Code of Law and Code as Law’ (2019) 82 The Modern Law Review 207

  • Yeung M and Leung J, ‘Removing Linguistic Barriers to Justice: A Study of Official Reference Texts for Unrepresented Litigants in Hong Kong’ (2015) 28 International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 135

  • Zeleznikow J and Hunter D, ‘Rationales for the Continued Development of Legal Expert Systems’ (1992) 3 Journal of Law and Information Science 94

  • Zhao G and others, ‘Engineering an Ontology of Financial Securities Fraud’ in Robert Meersman, Zahir Tari and Angelo Corsaro (eds), On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2004: OTM 2004 Workshops, vol 3292 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2004) <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-540-30470-8_73>

  • Ziegler P, ‘Information Collection Techniques for the Evaluation of the Legislative Process’ (1988) 9 Statute Law Review 160

  • Zoet M and Smit K, ‘Business Rules Management Principles In The Dutch Governmental Context’ [2016] PACIS 2016 Proceedings <https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2016/260>

  • zur Muehlen M and Indulska M, ‘Modeling Languages for Business Processes and Business Rules: A Representational Analysis’ (2010) 35 Information Systems 379

Internet Material

  • France Strategie “Comment partager les charges liees aux enfants apres une separation? (18 June 2015): <https://www.strategie.gouv.fr/publications/partager-charges-liees-aux-enfants-apres-une-separation>

  • Hélène Périvier “Do separated fathers bear a greater sacrifice in their standard of living than their ex-partners?” (8 July 2015, Blog of the Observatoire français des conjonctures économiques): <https://www.ofce.sciences-po.fr/blog/separated-fathers-bear-greater-sacrifice-standard-living-ex-partners/>

  • Morris, J “10 Questions and Answers about Rules as Code” (26 May 2020) Medium: <https://roundtablelaw.medium.com/10-questions-and-answers-about-rules-as-code-a26ecc091828>

Speeches and Lectures

  • Lord Renton, Chairman of the Committee on the Preparation of Legislation “The Renton Report’s Tenth Birthday” (speech made at a reception in the House of Lords, 1 May 1985)

  • The Hon Justice M J Beazley AO “100 Years of Women in Law in NSW” (Lecture, 18 October 2018)

  • Justice Susan Glazebrook “Statutory interpretation in the Supreme Court” (an address given to the New Zealand Parliamentary Counsel Office, 2015)

  • Justice Virginia Bell AC, “By the Skin of Our Teeth –The Passing of the Women’s Legal Status Act 1918” (speech delivered at the Francis Forbes Lecture, NSW Bar Association Common Room, 30 May 2018).